About Us| Issues & Campaigns| Media| Get Involved| New to the Issue?| Donate

December 15, 2008

Granny Get Your Gun

Gun manufacturers are always looking for a sexy new product for the civilian market. Tom Diaz chronicled this phenomenon in his book Making a Killing: The Business of Guns in America, noting that manufacturers increasingly market guns to consumers by emphasizing their capacity, lethality and concealability.

From time to time, you will see some bizarre ideas come out of the gun industry. I remember a belt buckle pistol which could shoot two small bullets at the touch of a button. Then there was a gun designed to look like a cell phone. But neither of those examples can touch the new “Palm Pistol” as a sheer head-scratcher.

The Palm Pistol has been described by its manufacturer, Constitution Arms, as "an ergonomically novel self defense handgun designed for seniors, disabled and others with limited manual dexterity.” Constitution Arms states that the single-shot 9mm weapon is “suited for home defense, concealed carry or as a backup gun. It is also ideal for [individuals] who may have limited strength or manual dexterity. Using the thumb instead of the index finger for firing, it significantly reduces muzzle drift, one of the principal causes of inaccurate targeting. Point and shoot couldn't be easier.”

A controversy recently erupted when Constitution Arms reported that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had formally designated the gun as a medical device. This gave rise to the suggestion that the Palm Pistol might be available by prescription and covered by Medicare.

Thankfully, none of this was based in truth. FDA spokeswoman Siobhan DeLancey recently made this clear, stating that her agency "has determined that the Palm Pistol, manufactured by Constitution Arms, is not a medical device under the Federal Food, Drugs, and Cosmetic Act.”

Matthew Carmel of Constitution Arms reacted angrily, saying, “I would assume it's due to political pressure … I find it quite ironic that certain elements of the political spectrum demand more protection for the weak, yet when someone steps up to the plate to provide that protection, to empower the weak from predators, they somehow cast a blind eye to their needs.”

Carmel certainly did step up to the plate. He stepped up and invented a gun with a hair trigger for older Americans with limited arm and wrist strength. It doesn’t take much imagination to see what could go wrong here. I can see an older gentleman responding to a noise at night, grabbing his Palm Pistol, and accidentally discharging it by clenching his fist when his cat runs out from behind a couch. Or perhaps, moving quickly through the house, his legs fail and he discharges the gun as he crashes to the ground. Or perhaps his four-year-old grandson visits one weekend, eager to show off his “limited manual dexterity.” And let’s not even get into the potential for suicide with this product…

In all likelihood, Carmel purposely put out fake information about the FDA approval to gain free advertising for his product. Tragically, the Palm Pistol will likely be on the market soon without ever being tested for consumer safety. Guns remain one of the only products in America not regulated by the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

2 comments:

  1. First off there is nothing wrong with having a firearm that has a "high capacity" magazine. The more "friends", ammunition, you have, the better. Since criminal's aren't burdened by "high capacity" magazine bans why should the rest of us that are not criminal's be limited to "restricted capacity" magazines?

    Secondly, concealability, what's wrong with being able to "conceal" a firearm? Concealability is needed because there are people out there that are afraid of firearms and don't want to have anything to do with them or even SEE them at all. Like that old saying goes "Out of sight, out of mind". So instead of telling those people who don't like seeing firearms to "get over it" we decided to accommodate these people by carrying concealed.

    Thirdly, firearms are only as lethal as the place where someone is shot at. Just like with any other object unless someone is "hit" in a vital area i.e. head, neck, spine, heart, lungs, kidney, liver, or main arteries firearms aren't "lethal".

    Lastly, firearms are safety regulated by the company that makes them. They are tested constantly to make sure they are safe before they leave the factory. Why purchase a firearm that's not going to work?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the comment, Rudy. What evidence do you have that the Palm Pistol was tested for safety? - CSGV

    ReplyDelete